Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Attilatheblond

(9,298 posts)
6. Maybe to some extent, but hope or no hope for the near future seems to matter greatly
Mon May 25, 2026, 03:55 PM
Monday

Boomer myself and growing up we did have to worry a lot about "THE BOMB" but otherwise, the future looked pretty rosy. Our parents won that war, science, and industry were making amazing leaps. Most communities could afford improving schools. The future looked pretty bright and my parents' generation had an overwhelming positive mental attitude about what all was going on. Thus, the 'baby boom'.

GI bill meant more education for more people and more education generally brings about more liberalism. Optimism and some increases in opportunity, even for the working class was the norm, even as we struggled in matters of racial justice and lifting boats peopled by neighbors of a different color. Social justice made some important strides even when the old money loathed the rocking of the yachts their old social norms stayed afloat in.

But, alas, the ultra rich didn't like the expansion of the middle class, the class that was building the rosy future. They hired politicians and strategists who would pontificate that greed was good and they could achieve and maintain power by dividing us rather than fostering better universal educational and vocational opportunities. Those jerks decided money and power for them was more important than decent futures for the masses. They decided to get us all fighting each other more and progressing less.

After a couple more generations of the rich encouraging self serving culture wars, less education, drastically eroding opportunities and the environment being savaged for immediate profit for the aging ultra rich feeling mortality's cold breath on their shoulders who didn't want to leave any personal profit making chance on the table, well, things are in the shitter now.

It's not just being able to avoid unwanted pregnancies that makes people in their childbearing years think 'nah, maybe not'. There is real, and justified fear that the future is not a good place for children.

Recommendations

4 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Even if I were inclined to have wanted kids, FoxNewsSucks Monday #1
Totally understandable. Yours is the same reason my youngest son refuses to ever have children. ancianita Monday #2
Yep. I felt that way 45 years ago. Auggie Monday #3
The reason for so few babies is that people can now plan their families and avoid unwanted pregnancies. Midnight Writer Monday #4
Maybe to some extent, but hope or no hope for the near future seems to matter greatly Attilatheblond Monday #6
We had our two sons when Bill Clinton was President. We wouldn't do so now, were we young enough to do so. NNadir Monday #5
Understood. Were I young I'd note the international numbers and seriously consider doing the same. ancianita Monday #11
I have always told right to lifers randr Monday #7
Amen, amen! ancianita Monday #8
George Carlin's description of pro-forced birthers, oops, right-to-lifers: niyad Monday #10
I was very fortunate to come of age when The Pill was becoming niyad Monday #9
It takes two incomes in many cases just to pay for rent, car, living expenses. Diamond_Dog Monday #12
I think AI is in the background, being used for jobs humans used to do, men included. Though AI will never surpass human ancianita Monday #13
My grandson decided at the age of twenty-two that he was never going to have kids. Aristus Monday #14
It is because women now have a choice to say "no" to men and their institutions. valleyrogue Monday #15
yup Skittles Monday #16
Latest Discussions»Editorials & Other Articles»Why So Few Babies? We Mig...»Reply #6