Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

OmahaBlueDog

(10,000 posts)
4. Here's my take
Sat Jan 12, 2013, 12:02 PM
Jan 2013

The law gives lifetime protection to Omma and W-Bush. These are the two Presidents that are most likely to be terrorist targets at some points in their lives after their presidency. I'd rather have them be given armed protection from assasination or kidnapping rather than a) have one of them killed in a terrorist incident in which we will have to put troops in harm's way retalliating or b) having one of them get kidnapped and having to put highly trained troops (Seals/Rangers/Berets/Marines) in harms way rescuing them.

Also, while I realize any armed protection for this President offends the nutters and the gun crowd, since when have we ever objected to federal agents being armed?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Propaganda Debunking»This is making the rounds...»Reply #4