Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Artists

brush

(59,593 posts)

2. IMO AI programs renderomg visual images...

Reply to progressoid (Original post)

Wed Dec 14, 2022, 07:48 PM

Dec 2022

using reference material from opt-in artists[ who get a royalty for each use as paid in the music industry, sure. OK.

As an artist myself though and knowing what it is to create original work, such AI-generated images seem NFT-adjacent and are of considerably lesser value than an original, one-of-a-kind piece created by a human hand and sprung from a human mind.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

7 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

The End of Art: An Argument Against Image AIs [View all] progressoid Dec 2022 OP

AI and programming. Eyeball_Kid Dec 2022 #1

I think we're talking about two different things. progressoid Dec 2022 #3

IMO AI programs renderomg visual images... brush Dec 2022 #2

I fear this is the beginning of the end for most commercial art LostOne4Ever Dec 2022 #4

Don't know if this reply will kick a thread this old, but here's a new article highplainsdem Feb 2023 #5

Wow. progressoid Feb 2023 #6

You're welcome. I've been posting a lot about AI because of the harm highplainsdem Feb 2023 #7