Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TheBlackAdder

(28,951 posts)
4. Oh, I didn't read it. It's just one of the excuses toll road proponents use to justify the fleecing.
Sun Mar 19, 2023, 09:01 AM
Mar 2023

.

There will be the following:

1) An administrations board who will be paid six to seven figures each.
2) Multi-million dollar bond contracts to chosen financial institutions to manage the bonds.
3) Employees to work toll and maintenance, along with the provisioned equipment.
4) Contracts to gasoline and rest stop companies and food merchants.
5) Purchase of toll scanners and cameras to capture toll evaders and the firm processing those issues.
6) Bid contracts to towing companies, as AAA and other car clubs will not be allowed on it.

And a whole bunch of other things.

People will still drive, whether there is a toll road or not. That excuse they give to reduce traffic is very weak and does not pan out with the scores of other toll systems across the USA. People have to drive to work, and can't afford hours on a bus or relocation.

.

NJ Turnpike is sort of like that. Scrivener7 Mar 2023 #1
As a former frequent driver on it, I'd pay tolls and gasoline tax, when 80% of mileage was on it. TheBlackAdder Mar 2023 #2
I read this as more of a congestion issue than an EV issue. But I couldn't get the Scrivener7 Mar 2023 #3
Oh, I didn't read it. It's just one of the excuses toll road proponents use to justify the fleecing. TheBlackAdder Mar 2023 #4
Lol! Yep! I bet you're right! Scrivener7 Mar 2023 #5
I was one of those that fought former Gov. Jon Corzine's toll road scam he was trying to implement. TheBlackAdder Mar 2023 #6
Thanks for your posts Auggie Mar 2023 #9
Not that I'm knocking your article, but in most states, don't they already have admin. boards SWBTATTReg Mar 2023 #18
It depends on how the charter is written. It won't use the standard State DOT commission. TheBlackAdder Mar 2023 #21
It's a congestion and carbon emissions story Auggie Mar 2023 #8
They kind of do that with the express lane. They better have adequate affordable mass transit if JohnSJ Mar 2023 #7
The rich have helicopters. usonian Mar 2023 #10
The jobs that the poor are concentrated in are not able to WFH MichMan Mar 2023 #11
Exactly. Additionally, most have been priced out of the Bay Area ... Auggie Mar 2023 #13
Why would the "skies be clouded by attendant pollution" ? MichMan Mar 2023 #12
Public transit conundrum lambchopp59 Mar 2023 #14
These "Bay Area transportation planners" must be new to the area. Mr.Bill Mar 2023 #15
It got worse. Especially in the North Bay. Auggie Mar 2023 #16
I'm sure it did. Mr.Bill Mar 2023 #17
Again, TFG is way ahead of us. Flying cars! Who needs roads? Midnight Writer Mar 2023 #19
This message was self-deleted by its author Midnight Writer Mar 2023 #20
Great. Grind down the working man/woman The Mouth Mar 2023 #22
It's just an idea for now Auggie Mar 2023 #23
A stupid, elitist, anti-working class one The Mouth Mar 2023 #24
Latest Discussions»Region Forums»California»A per-mile highway toll? ...»Reply #4