Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
4. I can't provide a source, but I have read a couple of times - maybe editorials in CA papers - that they're in cahoots:
Tue Jan 16, 2024, 07:57 PM
Jan 2024

California utilities won't push back against CA's aggressive renewable energy targets (although they don't necessarily think they are even possible), and the PUC will approve whatever the utilities says it will cost to implement these targets. Example: It will definitely cost a fortune to extend the life of PG&E's Diablo Canyon nuclear plant beyond its original planned service life, but that's what the governor wants (so the lights don't go out under his watch), so I expect that the PUC is going to approve whatever it ultimately costs.

Although I don't live in California anymore, I did for 54 years and spent the first part of my career as a power plant engineer for SCE, so I tend to read anything related to the energy markets in CA.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»California»Why are our legislators a...»Reply #4