Indiana

He is refraining from it. He has not stopped anyone from telling anyone else anything.

2. Why should he hold them for ICE when his agency has nothing to do with that? Despite what some rethugs want to believe, one cannot legally hold someone without cause. A 'request' from another agency can be honored or not, they are not under obligation to do so.

3. I believe it says that anything not specifically mentioned in the Constitution falls onto the individual states. I do not know of any law that says locals have to bow to the whims of the federal government in such instances as mentioned in that rethug AG's suit. But, I am not a lawyer.

Basically, this all boils down to, "Waahhh! They won't hold people for us so that we can be mean to them!"