Kansas

blatant unconstitutional taint of these proposals (first amendment at least). Garber's legislation is pointing to a failure of his own parenting skills perhaps. I also would think that other parents would be offended in someone dictating to them how to parent.

Also, if internet providers have to provide these so called blocking devices (which won't work) I think that they would all pull out of the state or provide a very limited feed if at any at all. Besides, some carriers already somewhat regulate content in their feeds by morals clauses in their provider contracts.