Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Massachusetts

(1,418 posts)

2. Uhhh, maybe because democrats

Sat Sep 29, 2012, 07:42 AM

Sep 2012

get almost as much campaign money from the uber rich and large corporations as the repugs
do.. not a lot of traction there.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

11 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Warren and Brown made a pact to not use negative ads nt auburngrad82 Sep 2012 #1

Brown has been running negative ads thucythucy Sep 2012 #3

Not true The pact is that there will be no third party ads. Mass Sep 2012 #11

Uhhh, maybe because democrats Iggy Sep 2012 #2

Warren is as progressive a Democrat thucythucy Sep 2012 #4

Agreed... However Iggy Sep 2012 #5

So... Now the Truth is "Silly Nonsense" Iggy Sep 2012 #10

Oh NOT NEARLY as much. Just look at the RePUKE Super Pacs. Come on. RBInMaine Sep 2012 #6

You're Implying.... Iggy Sep 2012 #8