Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

thucythucy

(8,819 posts)
8. I disagree.
Tue Apr 26, 2022, 03:39 PM
Apr 2022

According to the article, the solution to the problem seemed pretty easily implemented, and yet the management of the course evidently blew off the homeowners until the suit was filed. And having a golf ball blast through your bedroom window, showering a child with glass, is hardly what I'd call a benefit.

And buying the house at market value would do nothing to compensate this family for the unnecessary abuse they suffered. Not to mention, I imagine the value of the house has been much depreciated by having such shitty neighbors.

As for "well-tended landscape"--please. You mean the near constant drone of leaf blowers, weed whackers, riding mowers, not to mention the petrochemical-based fertilizers used to keep those ecological dead zones so pretty and "green?" No wonder Trump loves his courses so much, they're loud, expensive, exclusive, and damaging to the environment. What's not to love?

I'm sure the judgment will be reduced on appeal, they often are. But I'm glad to see loutish behavior get its proper come-back.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Massachusetts»MA family wins $5 million...»Reply #8