Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

North Carolina

OldBaldy1701E

(7,238 posts)

4. What it shows

Reply to abqtommy (Reply #3)

Tue Jun 15, 2021, 07:16 PM

Jun 2021

Is that the rethugs are doing anything to garner positive attention, but they also know they owe their souls to Duke Energy. So, they will say they are going to do this and that, and by 2030, something will come up that will allow them to move the date. Or, ignore it altogether.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

4 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Bill retires many North Carolina coal-fired plants, boosts renewables [View all] TexasTowelie Jun 2021 OP

Republicans governing? Turbineguy Jun 2021 #1

That's ok. Trump has brought back the coal industry like he promised. Right? keithbvadu2 Jun 2021 #2

"By the end of 2030" shows that there's not much rush to get this done but then it's better abqtommy Jun 2021 #3

What it shows OldBaldy1701E Jun 2021 #4