Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Oregon

Samrob

(4,298 posts)

3. Notice how SCOTUS sides with the racists by denying payments for emotional damages.

Reply to Demovictory9 (Original post)

Fri Apr 29, 2022, 05:21 AM

Apr 2022

This SCOTUS SUCKS big time. I am sure the victim in this case suffered severe emotional and mental damage. They seem to only vote with minority victims of racial hate when there is no award of financial damages that might enrich the victims. No pain and suffering to minority victims of racial hate.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

5 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Hidden camera catches Beaverton woman who left 'hate-filled' notes on neighbor's car for 2 yrs plus [View all] Demovictory9 Apr 2022 OP

Pathetic NJCher Apr 2022 #1

I hope the victim gets every penny she's asking for, and then some. SunSeeker Apr 2022 #2

Notice how SCOTUS sides with the racists by denying payments for emotional damages. Samrob Apr 2022 #3

What does the SCOTUS have to do with this article? intheflow Apr 2022 #4

This weeks scotus ruling would limit damages in similar case Demovictory9 Apr 2022 #5