in relation to activities and events, possible protest actions. LE is probably in for criticism if they don't have at least some handle on this? There is also mention of keeping records (referenced to here as dossiers), in some cases of public speech and statements, on certain organizations. Potentially perhaps more problematic? But again - if this amounts to bookmarking a page where someone has made a public statement .. ? Or someone joining a Facebook group or following an Instagram account .. ?
- AP article - It alleges that the police department broke the law by monitoring or infiltrating social media accounts or groups for information about protests, including Black Lives Matter demonstrations following the killing of George Floyd by Minneapolis police in 2020 and a Bans off our bodies demonstration around the U.S. Supreme Courts decision overturning the federal right to abortion in 2022.
Among the emails cited in the lawsuit were some showing that police monitored activists social media for information about the showing of a drive-in movie in conjunction with Juneteenth activities in 2020, amid broader demonstrations over Floyds death; about demonstrations concerning a COVID-19 outbreak at a local jail; and about any plans for protests related to the Supreme Courts Dobbs decision overturning Roe v. Wade.
The lawsuit said public records showed police kept a dossier on the local nonprofit the Rogue Valley Pepper Shakers, which promotes LGBTQ+ and abortion rights, including screenshots of its Facebook page.
Other records included emails concerning Stabbin Wagon an organization that advocates for and provides clean syringes, overdose reversal medication, and contraceptives to at-risk and unhoused residents as well as public statements its founder Melissa Jones had made criticizing police raids on homeless encampments.
What we don't see here is any accusations of telephone tapping, tracking devices, or tailing people as they go to work or place of worship. I.e. - super-duper
surveillance.