Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

cascadiance

(19,537 posts)
7. It was just noted that open primaries in California made it WORSE for third party candidates...
Thu Jul 17, 2014, 11:39 PM
Jul 2014

... being part of the election. So WHAT IS THE POINT? Other than destroying our primary elections, reducing voter turnout, and letting elite money determine who gets the most attention in the primary elections...

http://touch.latimes.com/#section/-1/article/p2p-80810685/

So, is the electoral deck stacked even more for Democrats and Republicans under California's top-two primary system? Judging by the secretary of state’s Statement of Vote released Monday for the June 3 primaries, the answer is, yes.

It turns out the top-two primary means a thinner, less diverse ballot both in the primaries and in the November general election, which was anticipated by critics of the approach. This is the system under which only the top-two finishers in a primary, regardless of party affiliation, continue on to the general election.

As the Public Policy Institute of California’s Mark Baldassare points out, seven of the eight statewide races in November will feature showdowns between one Republican and one Democrat (the nonpartisan school superintendent’s race will be between two Democrats). But there will be no additional Green Party candidates, nor the Peace and Freedom folks, American Independents or Libertarians on the ballot.

I, for one, will miss them.

...

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Oregon»After the Cantor lost due...»Reply #7