Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Martin68

(24,870 posts)
5. I worked in the field of stormwater management and watershed management for many years. Localities desperately
Fri Apr 5, 2024, 10:07 AM
Apr 2024

need funding to pay for these practices to prevent water pollution caused by stormwater runoff on impervious surfaces. A stormwater utility fee does not unfairly affect farmers because it is based on impervious surface, which is not something farmland has a lot of in spite of what this article claims. In Albamarle County, Virginia, one of the localities with which I worked, a similar proposal was defeated due to lies and distortions the Farm Bureau spread among the farming community in a tea-party style knee-jerk reaction to a perceived tax. A stormwater utility is just as important as the water, sewer, and electrical utilities we depend on. The fees we pay for those services are not called a tax. The same should be said of vitally needed stormwater utilities. One of the lies the Farm Bureau spread was that the tax would pay for an expansion of city government, which was false. It was primarily needed to maintain and improve the existing stormwater management systems in urban areas where most impervious surface exists.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Pennsylvania»Some Pa. municipalities a...»Reply #5