Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

LeonidPlanck

(231 posts)
3. Having a background in ecology
Wed Jun 5, 2024, 12:14 PM
Jun 2024

There may be plenty of compound reasons for this. I’m not really interested in learning Pitt’s argument because it’s an argument made all over the country. Unfortunately, it often becomes political when usually it’s highly scientific. Historically, we’ve culled the populations large predators like wolves and bears (except bears tend to he highly opportunistic rather than overt predators). Read A Sand County Almanac or Never Cry Wolf. The result is significant overpopulation and proliferation of disease (I.e. Chronic Wasting Disease) in prey species. I suspect the hunting, likely suggested by the state department of ecology who has been studying the problem for years, is because the local deer population is growing out of control with no mitigating megafauna.

We are the megafauna because we drove-off or hunted all the native varieties. So, venison anyone?

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Pennsylvania»Why Is Pittsburgh Looking...»Reply #3