Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

SWBTATTReg

(24,688 posts)
1. Need to insert more responsibility into this whole process of students and others being evaluated, as this
Thu Feb 29, 2024, 02:01 PM
Feb 2024

issue becomes more and more pronounced (using this to cheat). Develop a more aggressive testing process (it'll take far more time to evaluate students and others (job applicants etc.) for job positions). Keep students in the class and test them there. Test more often.

All this reminds me of, is when my instructors back in the day forbid us to have a calculator in class during testing. Most people now-a-days would say 'WHAT!' (and calculators are a given now).

Also, I've heard of some businesses hiring people w/o the testing, w/o the usual application crap as most job applicants completes, and ride w/ the hiring decision on the spot. A decision is now made on whether the decision to hire or not is made while on the job.

People if they get caught cheating, using these tools, should be disallowed from proceeding forward. There must be a penalty for cheating.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Washington»To ban or embrace ChatGPT...»Reply #1