Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Washington

Showing Original Post only (View all)

Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

(136,312 posts)
Wed Apr 15, 2026, 02:01 AM Wednesday

Plans for first Seattle WinCo store hit obstacle [View all]

A proposal to open Seattle's first WinCo Foods store hit a roadblock last week after a hearing examiner reversed a previous environmental impact exception from the city.

WinCo first filed plans to open its new store at 13550 Aurora Ave. N. in 2024. The Boise, Idaho-based discount grocer has sought to fill the 144,776-square-foot former Sam's Club, which closed in 2018. The Walmart-owned chain also closed stores in Renton and Auburn.

-snip-

WinCo's proposal seemed to be methodically working its way through the city's permitting process before hitting local opposition.

The opposition has been led by Lake Washington Working Families, a coalition of King County residents, activists and organizations describing itself as supporting "sustainable growth and good jobs in King County, while limiting impacts to climate change and our natural environment."

https://www.bizjournals.com/seattle/news/2026/04/14/winco-foods-grocery-stalled-hearing-examiner-north.html

The objection doesn't make a lot of sense. WinCo is an employee-owned store that offers fairly affordable prices.

1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Plans for first Seattle WinCo store hit obstacle [View all] Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Wednesday OP
WINCO has always been... 2naSalit Wednesday #1
Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Washington»Plans for first Seattle W...»Reply #0