So I have a question for you: My understanding of the NDP platform is that there is no need to run a deficit because the money can actually be found. Raise corporate taxes slightly, close tax loopholes, reprioritize budget items. By doing this, funds will become available for the social and other programmes they're promising. They're saying a deficit isn't necessary.
Now I agree it sends a certain message when they say they absolutely will NOT run a deficit, but I think they needed to get ahead of that potential liability. Ie, if they'd started out saying they would run deficits, they would have immediately been attacked as the tax-and-spend socialists that "everyone" fears.
So, my question: Do you really think they "swallowed the Cons crap," or do you think maybe they actually do believe they can balance the budget by changing the way money is collected and spent? Is this scenario even possible?
And if they can't do what they say, then given the NDP values and history, chances are they'll end up running a deficit. Win-win, as far as I'm concerned.