Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

United Kingdom

Showing Original Post only (View all)

Emrys

(7,941 posts)
Tue Jul 2, 2024, 10:09 PM Jul 2024

Labour is putting its plans for Britain in the hands of private finance. It could end badly [View all]

Handing vital infrastructure to private investment companies will generate windfalls for investors and leave the rest of us worse off. We need a better plan

Daniela Gabor is professor of economics and macrofinance at UWE Bristol


The Labour party has a plan for returning to power: it will get BlackRock to rebuild Britain. Its reasoning is straightforward. A cash-strapped government that wants to avoid tax increases or austerity has no choice but to partner with big finance, attracting private investment to rebuild the infrastructure that is crumbling after years of Tory underinvestment. Labour has already done the arithmetic: to mobilise £3 of private capital from institutional investors, you need to offer them £1 in public subsidies. But every time you hear Labour announce such an infrastructure partnership, think of the hidden politics. BlackRock will privatise Britain – our housing, education, health, nature and green energy – with our taxpayer money as sweetener.

BlackRock has long peddled the idea of public-private partnerships for infrastructure, climate and development. Yet its political momentum has recently accelerated. When its chair, Larry Fink, the world’s most powerful financier, sat with world leaders at the G7 summit last month, he promised the following: rich countries need growth, infrastructure investment can deliver that growth, but public debt is too high for the state alone to invest the estimated $75tn (£59tn) necessary by 2040. Trillions, however, are available to asset managers who look after our pensions and insurance contributions (BlackRock, the largest of these firms, manages about $10tn, as a shrinking welfare state pushes us – future pensioners – into its arms).

If governments work with big finance, Fink explained, they can unlock these trillions. But to do so, they will need to mint public infrastructure into investable assets that can generate steady returns for investors. Why does BlackRock need the state? Why can’t it deploy trillions without the government’s helping hand? The British public remembers all too well PFIs, the private finance initiatives through which the state ended up paying extortionate amounts to private contractors that designed, built, financed or operated public services such as prisons, schools and hospitals before handing them back to the state, often in poor condition.

But for big finance, there is more now at stake. In this golden age of infrastructure, financiers plan to own our infrastructure outright and transform it into a source of steady revenue. Since buying Global Infrastructure Partners in January 2024, BlackRock holds about $150bn in infrastructure assets, including US renewable energy companies, wastewater services in France and airports in England and Australia. It plans to expand aggressively, just like other private infrastructure funds. Direct ownership is the main game, but not the only one. Big finance can also invest in infrastructure indirectly, by lending to private infrastructure companies. The key is returns. For this, BlackRock wants the state to “derisk” investments. This financial jargon was included in the 2024 Labour manifesto, and it in essence involves the state stepping in to improve the returns on infrastructure assets.

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/article/2024/jul/02/labour-plans-britain-private-finance-blackrock


Many parts of Britain are indeed still paying off the debts resulting from deals arranged under the Private Finance Initiative contracts instigated by the Tories in 1992 and enthusiastically embraced by Labour Chancellor of the Exchequer Gordon Brown from 1997 onward to fund infrastructure projects, including roads, hospitals and schools, while keeping the government's books less in the red than they might otherwise be.

The Tories announced in 2018 that they would abandon the use of PFI. The deals currently in force - there are around 700 of them in the UK as a whole - still apply, but the earlier ones are beginning to expire, a major part of that shift beginning next year, meaning the assets will be returned to local authorities or the state. And given the shoddy workmanship in some cases which has seen disasters like whole walls of some schools collapsing, along with unsuitable materials such as reinforced autoclaved aerated concrete now revealed to have been used in a number of public buildings, that may prove even more costly than the already too business-friendly terms of some of the deals.

And now Labour looks set to expand this adventure in capitalism as a desperate attempt to fulfil its latest fetish for out-Torying the Tories and avoiding having to hike taxes by nationalizing the risks involved and privatizing the profits in a pattern that's grown all too familiar over the years.

12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Latest Discussions»Region Forums»United Kingdom»Labour is putting its pla...»Reply #0