Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Election Reform

kctim

(3,575 posts)

25. It is not only MY conclusion

Reply to The Doctor. (Reply #18)

Fri Apr 27, 2012, 09:48 AM

Apr 2012

it is also the conclusion of the Democratic Party and, due to the lack of legal action taken, it is also the conclusion of those with the closest association with the issue raised.

You are arguing an opinion of what "really" happened based on interpretations of information that the majority of people involved do not agree with, and there is nothing that ANYBODY can show you that will make you change that opinion.

It's the birther conspiracy for elections.
YOU have the info nobody wants to acknowledge.
YOU have pieced together all that info no one else could.
YOU have proven without a reasonable doubt that YOU are the one who is right.
YOU can bring down the entire process but nobody will listen.

I can't argue against that man. You win.
I will now go tell the guy who has proof Bigfoot is flying UFOs that he also wins.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

29 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

So, What Are the Facts that 'Prove' Ohio '04 was a Rigged Election? [View all] The Doctor. Mar 2012 OP

If you are really interested in this issue go over to the Brad blog.com.... He does alot of stuff southernyankeebelle Mar 2012 #1

here's a good start blm Mar 2012 #2

Facts Botany Mar 2012 #3

Thank you. The Doctor. Mar 2012 #4

big dots Botany Mar 2012 #5

I understand... The Doctor. Mar 2012 #6

People can have different opinions but you can only have one set of facts Botany Mar 2012 #7

Such proof is not hard to explain. The Doctor. Mar 2012 #8

You don't have to convince him that it happened. You only have to convince him that it's possible.. Scuba Mar 2012 #9

+ Every one of those millions of Americans who understand the issue truedelphi Apr 2012 #22

I can lead a wingnut to info but I cannot make him think. Botany Mar 2012 #11

Thank you for this excellent summary / recap of these event.... Scuba Mar 2012 #10

Can you please provide a link for those? The Doctor. Mar 2012 #14

So the salon.com article kctim Mar 2012 #12

No, it's called a 'starting point'. I have trouble believing that you 'did the research'. The Doctor. Mar 2012 #13

Ah, a 'starting point' kctim Mar 2012 #15

Yes, a starting point. The Doctor. Apr 2012 #18

It is not only MY conclusion kctim Apr 2012 #25

How typical. All you have is derision to fall back on. The Doctor. Apr 2012 #26

Those in control of the Democratic Party at the highest levels are truedelphi Apr 2012 #27

Also, a question: The Doctor. Apr 2012 #29

What proof do you want? Sancho Apr 2012 #19

This message was self-deleted by its author The Doctor. Apr 2012 #17

You know kctim you keep talking and talking. I really suggest you take the time to go over southernyankeebelle Apr 2012 #28

Read "Witness to a Crime" by Richard Hayes Phillips. truckin Apr 2012 #16

You might thoroughly read the following article: truedelphi Apr 2012 #20

You might also read this article as well: truedelphi Apr 2012 #21

You might also consider purchasing the excellent video truedelphi Apr 2012 #23

Also look at the "Carville Effect" truedelphi Apr 2012 #24