Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Election Reform
In reply to the discussion: Show Me The Source Code Or Throw The Voting Machines Out!!!!! [View all]Luvapottamus
(31 posts)149. DARPA funded Opensource voting software and hardware
DARPA Is Building a $10 Million, Open Source, Secure Voting System
https://motherboard.vice.com/en_us/article/yw84q7/darpa-is-building-a-dollar10-million-open-source-secure-voting-system
Unless the hardware is opensource as well, particularly networking features.....
Only as secure and accurate as the weakest link in the chain.
The first-of-its-kind system will be designed by an Oregon-based firm called Galois, a longtime government contractor with experience in designing secure and verifiable systems. The system will use fully open source voting software, instead of the closed, proprietary software currently used in the vast majority of voting machines, which no one outside of voting machine testing labs can examine. More importantly, it will be built on secure open source hardware, made from secure designs and techniques developed over the last year as part of a special program at DARPA. The voting system will also be designed to create fully verifiable and transparent results so that voters dont have to blindly trust that the machines and election officials delivered correct results.
But DARPA and Galois wont be asking people to blindly trust that their voting systems are secureas voting machine vendors currently do. Instead theyll be publishing source code for the software online and bring prototypes of the systems to the Def Con Voting Village this summer and next, so that hackers and researchers will be able to freely examine the systems themselves and conduct penetration tests to gauge their security. Theyll also be working with a number of university teams over the next year to have them examine the systems in formal test environments.
Def Con is great, but [hackers there] will not give us as much technical details as we want [about problems they find in the systems], Linton Salmon, program manager in DARPAs Microsystems Technology Office who is overseeing the project, said in a phone call. Universities will give us more information. But we wont have as many people or as high visibility when we do it with universities....
https://motherboard.vice.com/en_us/article/yw84q7/darpa-is-building-a-dollar10-million-open-source-secure-voting-system
Unless the hardware is opensource as well, particularly networking features.....
Only as secure and accurate as the weakest link in the chain.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
149 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I say just throw them out, period. There are better ways. Ones in which people
silvershadow
Apr 2016
#1
I read several years ago about a system they had developed at a university there.
LiberalArkie
Apr 2016
#10
Those machines were designed from the git go to be hacked. That is the only way they would have been
LiberalArkie
Apr 2016
#29
At any time the congress could have mandated secure voting machines (it would be easy to do)
LiberalArkie
Apr 2016
#8
If the revolution can continue long enough to get some people in congress. If the old Occupy
LiberalArkie
Apr 2016
#25
Right You Are! Each month, there are 360,000,000 transactions processed by ATM
truedelphi
Apr 2016
#33
People have never demanded it. There are federal laws about accuracy with financial transactions
LiberalArkie
Apr 2016
#42
do you think these voting machines are also the reason Obama won twice?
La Lioness Priyanka
Apr 2016
#13
In New York 126,000 voters 14% of all Democrats in Brooklyn were purged. That's no accident.
think
Apr 2016
#31
A Republican elections office person has been suspended and an investigation is ongoing.
pnwmom
Apr 2016
#40
They could have voted for their hearts desire if they had registered last October, since he
pnwmom
Apr 2016
#41
foolish to trust any system we the people cannot personally oversee
questionseverything
Apr 2016
#61
while making sure the "output" the machine spits out is possible, not reporting more votes than
questionseverything
Apr 2016
#108
you keep referring to making the count match how many voted, which is ONE step
questionseverything
Apr 2016
#114
i knew no human actually counted the vote...just wanted you to admit it ,thanks
questionseverything
Apr 2016
#140
All the main touchscreen machine types and the Diebold Optical Scans have been hacked in tests.
Hacking_Democracy
Aug 2016
#145
All insiders with access can change the electronic votes, not just the voting machine companies.
Hacking_Democracy
Aug 2016
#147
it was the reporting website that they tried to cover with a "mirror" website with a different
questionseverything
Apr 2016
#109
Did not know this group existed. This primary is so rigged. It is very obvious for who.
bkkyosemite
Apr 2016
#72
In India and other countries with parliamentary systems, voters don't choose candidates
eridani
Apr 2016
#83
I think paper ballot with counting at each precinct is THE only way to go.
MrMickeysMom
Apr 2016
#88
"It is enough that the people know there was an election. The people who cast the votes decide
ish of the hammer
Apr 2016
#89
I believe if we polled Americans and asked them if they could wait until the next day
stillwaiting
Apr 2016
#101