Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ret5hd

(21,320 posts)
5. My maybe very faulty understanding:
Thu Jul 6, 2023, 10:46 PM
Jul 2023

Linux kernel is open.

Anything someone (individual or group) writes and puts under the open source license is open.

Anything open sourced and modified by someone is still open source.

Anything someone (individual or group) writes and wants to keep “private” (a set of libraries or routines that stands independent of open source stuff) but can be called by the kernel and/or other open source code MAY be copyrighted.

So all the stuff that Redhat uses that is open will still be open. But the stand-alone routines/code/libraries that they wrote completely independently may be closed.

That’s my understanding of the open source license. It doesn’t stop Chase or GM or Redhat or whoever from writing proprietary code that uses open-source Linux.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Help & Search»Computer Help and Support»i am experimenting with f...»Reply #5