Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Ron Obvious

(6,261 posts)
4. Security
Thu Jul 17, 2014, 05:12 AM
Jul 2014

Yes, Microsoft were rather shackled by having to retrofit security into an old operating system designed for single user mode and before the internet, and without sacrificing compatibility. All that was redesigned from scratch with NT by Dave Cutler and his team.

I was never very happy with the filesystem security model with its ACLs, SACLs, DACLs and what have you, which I thought rather over-elaborate compared to the simpler but cleaner *NIX implementation which would cover 99% of what you'd need and was much easier to use and work with.

Of course, if you have physical access to a computer, only a highly encrypted file system will keep you from cracking it rather easily. Relatively few would have been willing to sacrifice the processor cycles that would have taken to maintain, though. At least in those days (I left shortly before Windows 2K came out).

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

As far as I know M$ pretty much defacto7 Jul 2014 #1
I feared as much... Ron Obvious Jul 2014 #2
Maybe a version of Linux would give you defacto7 Jul 2014 #3
Security Ron Obvious Jul 2014 #4
Tox? DavidG_WI Sep 2014 #5
Original Skype funding or development. PyaarRevolution Dec 2015 #6
Pretty sure asterisk can do video conferencing. n/t PowerToThePeople Jan 2016 #7
Message auto-removed Name removed Feb 2016 #8
Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Open Source and Free Software»Can any recommend an open...»Reply #4