Website, DB, & Software Developers

lapfog_1

(30,426 posts)

8. yes, it would be hard to have someone current with Python or something

Tue Sep 25, 2018, 09:56 PM

Sep 2018

to go back and paw through 10s of thousands of lines of COBOL to make adjustments to financial services processing.

What I can't believe is that these companies haven't (by this point now 18 years past Y2K) ported everything they need forward... not to mention the obvious inefficiency of running COBOL on some ancient OS running on a IBM 370 emulator in a Kubernetes container or docker container someplace. Only the much faster hardware makes this even feasible.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

12 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Do You Know Cobol? If So, There Might Be a Job for You. [View all] question everything Sep 2018 OP

It's been years, but I have done Cobol programming. CentralMass Sep 2018 #1

yes, I used to teach COBOL in college... hated it lapfog_1 Sep 2018 #2

Interesting. My first courses in College involved using... tapes question everything Sep 2018 #3

paper tape... or punch cards on a "reel" of paper... (actually usually fanfold. lapfog_1 Sep 2018 #5

I took two semesters of COBOL in college in 1991-92 padfun Sep 2018 #4

actually it was intended to be as far away from Assembly as possible lapfog_1 Sep 2018 #7

Languages padfun Sep 2018 #10

There was a call for COBOL programmers back around Y2K TlalocW Sep 2018 #6

yes, it would be hard to have someone current with Python or something lapfog_1 Sep 2018 #8

Someday take a look at an IBM Z14. sinkingfeeling Sep 2018 #12

oh, and there is still another "Y2K" issue coming up lapfog_1 Sep 2018 #9

Yes, I do, but retired. My 48 year old son is a programmer, who sinkingfeeling Sep 2018 #11