Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Barack Obama
In reply to the discussion: The DU double standard... [View all]1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)40. Here's a novel concept ...
Here's what often happens: The President proposes something. The Congressional leadership of his party honors party loyalty and supports "their" President. The Congressional leadership of the other major party works out their own position. Sometimes there's a vote on a bill that's pretty much what one side wanted, but often what finally emerges is some kind of compromise.
In that scenario, Sanders and Warren have the option of supporting the Obama position, the McConnell/Boehner position, or a compromise. Nothing else is on the table -- because Obama didn't use his office to put anything else on the table.
In that scenario, Sanders and Warren have the option of supporting the Obama position, the McConnell/Boehner position, or a compromise. Nothing else is on the table -- because Obama didn't use his office to put anything else on the table.
How about the Senators (and Reps) do what they are constitutionally charged to do ... write and work to pass legislation, for the President to sign.
Here's how it COULD happen:
The President proposes something. The Congressional leadership of his party writes the enabling legislation to the Left of the President's proposal. The Congressional leadership of the other major party works out their own position. Sometimes there's a vote on a bill that's pretty much what one side wanted, but often what finally emerges is some kind of compromise. And the compromise would be found somewhere between the position of the President and that of his Party leadership ... but certainly to the left of negotiation between the President and the opposition party's position.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
73 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
My intoxicated countryman, that is the political fundamentalist double standard.
wyldwolf
Jan 2014
#4
You appear to assume that a President and a Senator have equal political power.
Jim Lane
Jan 2014
#15
You've apparently failed to understand the difference between a group and a forum.
IrishAyes
Jan 2014
#21
Why are you asking me what a quote from someone else means? Why not ask THAT person?
IrishAyes
Feb 2014
#34
Since you're determined to cause dissension, I'll do my best to see that post #35
IrishAyes
Feb 2014
#36
According to the group's Statement of Purpose, this is "A safe haven for members
struggle4progress
Feb 2014
#38
They're determined to invade every corner of the world. Harder to get totally rid of
IrishAyes
Feb 2014
#69
Small minds are always horrified at bigger ones, aren't they? Poor little babes!
IrishAyes
Jan 2014
#22
It is a totally double standard. If President Obama walked on water, somebody'd be shouting,
IrishAyes
Jan 2014
#18
I have a friend who's black,,,I have a great gay friend,,,,I voted for Obama once upon a time..
Sheepshank
Feb 2014
#50
Not only that, when we point this out, we're "tarnishing Warren and Sanders"
stevenleser
Feb 2014
#73