Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Congress

Showing Original Post only (View all)

unhappycamper

(60,364 posts)
Fri Nov 1, 2013, 09:15 AM Nov 2013

At hearing on security clearances, senators learn that police records can go unchecked [View all]

http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/federal_government/at-hearing-on-security-clearances-senators-learn-that-police-records-can-go-unchecked/2013/10/31/6fca6650-425b-11e3-a751-f032898f2dbc_story.html?tid=hpModule_14fd66a0-9199-11e2-bdea-e32ad90da239



At hearing on security clearances, senators learn that police records can go unchecked
By Joe Davidson, Updated: Friday, November 1, 7:50 AM E-mail the writer

We know the story: Nine years before Aaron Alexis went on a homicidal rage at the Washington Navy Yard last month, shooting dead a dozen people, he was on another rage.

With a Glock 30 .45-caliber pistol, he shot the tires of a car belonging to a construction worker employed next door to Alexis’s home in Seattle.

In 2007, three years after that, Alexis, a defense contractor, was granted a “secret” security clearance. Government officials didn’t even know details of his earlier wrath. It led to his arrest but not a conviction.

That level of ignorance left members of a Senate committee dismayed at a federal security-clearance process that does not always check an individual’s police record.
1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Congress»At hearing on security cl...»Reply #0