Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Hillary Clinton
Showing Original Post only (View all)Ten thoughts on a Clinton-Warren 2016 ticket (HRC GP) [View all]
Personally, it was thrilling to see both of them today, yet I still trust HRC to choose her running mate!
Hillary Clinton and Elizabeth Warren stood together on a Cincinnati stage this morning, arms draped around each other, turning to every camera angle to make sure the photo op was fully taken advantage of. They then took turns lavishing political and personal praise on each other in a display so unified that it caught off guard even those of us who expected Elizabeth to eventually get strongly behind Hillary all along. And of course its raised the question, now more than ever, of whether were looking at a Clinton-Warren 2016 ticket. Here are ten thoughts on such a ticket:
1. Clinton and Warren are both savvy enough to know that by putting on this emphatic show of personal unity, theyre amplifying the talk of Warren being the running mate. Its possible that neither of them has any intention of actually being on a ticket together, and that theyre merely allowing the idea to be played up in order to quickly unify the party.
2. On the other hand, theyre also both no doubt aware that by playing it up this blatantly, theyre creating the expectation of a Clinton-Warren ticket, which could lead to a letdown in the eyes of some if it doesnt end up happening. That leads me to think that theyre both at least considering the possibility, or they wouldnt be putting on this kind of show right now.
3. The Clinton campaign has access to the kind of detailed internal polling data which tells her precisely how any given running mate would help or hurt her with each demographic or region. So those idly wondering if the nation is ready for a two-woman ticket, or if a New England progressive like Warren would play well nationally, can rest assured that Hillary is already staring at those answers on the paper in front of her even as the rest of us ask the questions.
4. Although Massachusetts has a republican governor, the rules stipulate that if Warren submits a letter of resignation in advance, she can force a special election such that she would immediately be replaced in the senate by the peoples choice and not by an appointee. So the popular notion that she would temporarily be replaced by a republican is a false one. The only question is whether the people of Massachusetts would vote for a democratic senate candidate to replace Warren. Thats not certain, but given the states liberal leanings and Warrens near-certain endorsement of her potential senate successor, its probable.
1. Clinton and Warren are both savvy enough to know that by putting on this emphatic show of personal unity, theyre amplifying the talk of Warren being the running mate. Its possible that neither of them has any intention of actually being on a ticket together, and that theyre merely allowing the idea to be played up in order to quickly unify the party.
2. On the other hand, theyre also both no doubt aware that by playing it up this blatantly, theyre creating the expectation of a Clinton-Warren ticket, which could lead to a letdown in the eyes of some if it doesnt end up happening. That leads me to think that theyre both at least considering the possibility, or they wouldnt be putting on this kind of show right now.
3. The Clinton campaign has access to the kind of detailed internal polling data which tells her precisely how any given running mate would help or hurt her with each demographic or region. So those idly wondering if the nation is ready for a two-woman ticket, or if a New England progressive like Warren would play well nationally, can rest assured that Hillary is already staring at those answers on the paper in front of her even as the rest of us ask the questions.
4. Although Massachusetts has a republican governor, the rules stipulate that if Warren submits a letter of resignation in advance, she can force a special election such that she would immediately be replaced in the senate by the peoples choice and not by an appointee. So the popular notion that she would temporarily be replaced by a republican is a false one. The only question is whether the people of Massachusetts would vote for a democratic senate candidate to replace Warren. Thats not certain, but given the states liberal leanings and Warrens near-certain endorsement of her potential senate successor, its probable.
Continues in link... http://www.dailynewsbin.com/opinion/ten-thoughts-on-a-clinton-warren-2016-ticket/25025/
13 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/726f9/726f9d2d1a621cd2ca5064510c33faeb32aa157f" alt=""
I think it would be a power house. The issue is that conventional wisdom has been to choose a
still_one
Jun 2016
#1
There is a large pool in which Hillary haa to pick a VP. It will come in time and dont
Thinkingabout
Jun 2016
#4