Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

karynnj

(60,087 posts)
1. That is an interesting article
Mon Jan 7, 2013, 02:22 PM
Jan 2013

It actually makes sense in why the Republicans are so negative - more so than Israel. It is interesting that the media is crediting him with being the first Republican to criticize - when some like Chafee voted against it. Nor were Clinton and Biden EARLY critics of the war and Obama , though he spoke against going in, voted against the ideas of Kerry/Feingold which he then embraced in concept in his own plan 6 months later. I am pointing this out, not to be picky, but to point out that in an article on how Obama (and his team) want to write the history of what happened in Iraq, they are framing the Democratic/Obama position as benignly as possible.

Another "little" historical fib is that Hagel endorsed Obama in 2008. I was surprised to hear and read this so many times when I did not remember it. Googling, I found that he did not "publicly" endorse Obama, but his wife did.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»John Kerry»Foreign Policy.com has an...»Reply #1