Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Nooooooooooooooo!!!! Smilo Mar 2013 #1
According to Reuters this is not final ProSense Mar 2013 #2
The Clintons set it up before John Kerry took over Kolesar Mar 2013 #3
The only thing I remember Kerry saying was that he would wait until the report was issued karynnj Mar 2013 #6
since Kerry is currently Sec of State can't he do something about it ? JI7 Mar 2013 #4
Pretty sure he came into State knowing the deal was done, since it was done years ago. blm Mar 2013 #5
That is the truth! n/t wisteria Mar 2013 #7
The report went for the worst approach, the one that hurts us more than anything. Mass Mar 2013 #8
Agree completely karynnj Mar 2013 #9
The problem is that they assume the project is viable at the same scale without the pipeline. Mass Mar 2013 #10
I agree and did challenge the assumption in another post karynnj Mar 2013 #11
They don't care that they will destroy Kerry's legacy on environmental issues. Clinton's a user and blm Mar 2013 #12
Kerry does not have to approve of the project based on this report - and Obama can overrule a Kerry karynnj Mar 2013 #13
I just don't see it that way. I am certain Kerry accepted Sec of State KNOWING he'd blm Mar 2013 #14
I think there will be a lot of pressure on him - from Democarts and Republicans in Congress, karynnj Mar 2013 #15
Disagree. It would make the POTUS look weak if a member of his cabinet went a different beachmom Mar 2013 #22
Well, keystone will be the least of the problems. Mass Mar 2013 #16
It's standard ops for them. They know how to work the press to play both narratives at the same blm Mar 2013 #17
The question I have is which side leaked that she wanted to arm the Syrian rebels? karynnj Mar 2013 #18
That would be her side - she historically matches up with McCain blm Mar 2013 #21
Relatedly, this seems to be threading the needle: beachmom Mar 2013 #23
Did you see Tommy Vietor's reply to that article? beachmom Mar 2013 #24
Thanks - I did not see that or any other response to the karynnj Mar 2013 #25
There is only ONE reason someone would deliberately misstate motive - blm Mar 2013 #26
Considering the choice of Moniz as Secretary of Energy, I guess this is a done deal. Mass Mar 2013 #19
Yeah, I was depressed by the Moniz choice. n/t MBS Mar 2013 #20
Stephen Chu also indicated it was a done deal bananas Mar 2013 #27
Last August. That deal had been brokered even before that. Thanks Hillary. blm Mar 2013 #28
It was August 2011, not 2012 bananas Mar 2013 #29
Missed year, but, it coincides with what I've been posting - deal's been done for years. blm Mar 2013 #30
This message was self-deleted by its author politicasista Apr 2013 #31
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»John Kerry»State Department has appr...»Reply #4