Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

beachmom

(15,239 posts)
23. Relatedly, this seems to be threading the needle:
Tue Mar 5, 2013, 04:15 PM
Mar 2013
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/06/world/middleeast/kerry-says-administration-backs-mideast-efforts-to-arm-syrian-rebels.html


Kerry Says Administration Backs Mideast Efforts to Arm Syrian Rebels

DOHA, Qatar — Secretary of State John Kerry said on Tuesday that the Obama administration supports efforts by Middle Eastern nations to send arms to the opposition in Syria, and had had discussions with foreign officials to make sure those arms go to moderate forces rather than extremists.

“We had discussions about the types of weapons that are being transferred, by whom,” Mr. Kerry said after a meeting with the prime minister of Qatar, which has been involved in arming the Syrian opposition.

Mr. Kerry’s comments were the most direct public affirmation to date that the Obama administration supports efforts to arm the Syrian resistance, provided that the arms are sent by other nations and care is taken to direct them to factions the United States supports.

His comments appeared to signal a shift in the administration’s strategy on Syria, as well as a more transparent effort to coordinate American support for the opponents of President Bashar al-Assad with the efforts of other nations.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Nooooooooooooooo!!!! Smilo Mar 2013 #1
According to Reuters this is not final ProSense Mar 2013 #2
The Clintons set it up before John Kerry took over Kolesar Mar 2013 #3
The only thing I remember Kerry saying was that he would wait until the report was issued karynnj Mar 2013 #6
since Kerry is currently Sec of State can't he do something about it ? JI7 Mar 2013 #4
Pretty sure he came into State knowing the deal was done, since it was done years ago. blm Mar 2013 #5
That is the truth! n/t wisteria Mar 2013 #7
The report went for the worst approach, the one that hurts us more than anything. Mass Mar 2013 #8
Agree completely karynnj Mar 2013 #9
The problem is that they assume the project is viable at the same scale without the pipeline. Mass Mar 2013 #10
I agree and did challenge the assumption in another post karynnj Mar 2013 #11
They don't care that they will destroy Kerry's legacy on environmental issues. Clinton's a user and blm Mar 2013 #12
Kerry does not have to approve of the project based on this report - and Obama can overrule a Kerry karynnj Mar 2013 #13
I just don't see it that way. I am certain Kerry accepted Sec of State KNOWING he'd blm Mar 2013 #14
I think there will be a lot of pressure on him - from Democarts and Republicans in Congress, karynnj Mar 2013 #15
Disagree. It would make the POTUS look weak if a member of his cabinet went a different beachmom Mar 2013 #22
Well, keystone will be the least of the problems. Mass Mar 2013 #16
It's standard ops for them. They know how to work the press to play both narratives at the same blm Mar 2013 #17
The question I have is which side leaked that she wanted to arm the Syrian rebels? karynnj Mar 2013 #18
That would be her side - she historically matches up with McCain blm Mar 2013 #21
Relatedly, this seems to be threading the needle: beachmom Mar 2013 #23
Did you see Tommy Vietor's reply to that article? beachmom Mar 2013 #24
Thanks - I did not see that or any other response to the karynnj Mar 2013 #25
There is only ONE reason someone would deliberately misstate motive - blm Mar 2013 #26
Considering the choice of Moniz as Secretary of Energy, I guess this is a done deal. Mass Mar 2013 #19
Yeah, I was depressed by the Moniz choice. n/t MBS Mar 2013 #20
Stephen Chu also indicated it was a done deal bananas Mar 2013 #27
Last August. That deal had been brokered even before that. Thanks Hillary. blm Mar 2013 #28
It was August 2011, not 2012 bananas Mar 2013 #29
Missed year, but, it coincides with what I've been posting - deal's been done for years. blm Mar 2013 #30
This message was self-deleted by its author politicasista Apr 2013 #31
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»John Kerry»State Department has appr...»Reply #23