Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
John Kerry
In reply to the discussion: State Department has approved the #Keystone XL pipeline plan as being environmentally sound [View all]bananas
(27,509 posts)29. It was August 2011, not 2012
The tweet didn't include the year but it was made in 2011,
and the link it goes to is a news article from August 2011.
http://www.energynow.com/video/2011/08/31/chu-says-us-energy-security-trade-off-favors-oil-sands-pipeline
Chu Says U.S. Energy Security 'Trade Off' Favors Oil-Sands Pipeline
(video)
Length 2:04
Created 08.31.11
Reporter Thalia Assuras
Air Date 08.31.11
In an exclusive interview with energyNOW! anchor Thalia Assuras, U.S. Energy Secretary Steven Chu says energy security concerns may help the Keystone XL oil-sands pipeline win approval.
Its certainly true that having Canada as a supplier for our oil is much more comforting than to have other countries supply our oil, Chu said in the interview, part of an energyNOW! special on Canadas oil sands and the Keystone XL pipeline debate which will air September 17 and 18 on Bloomberg Television and September 18 on WJLA ABC7 in Washington, D.C.
Its not perfect, but its a trade off, Chu said.
The proposed pipeline, currently under review by the U.S. State Department because it crosses the nation's border with Canada, would bring crude from Albertas oil sands to refineries on the U.S. Gulf coast. Chu is one of eight cabinet members advising Secretary of State Hillary Clinton on the project.
<snip>
Chu Says U.S. Energy Security 'Trade Off' Favors Oil-Sands Pipeline
(video)
Length 2:04
Created 08.31.11
Reporter Thalia Assuras
Air Date 08.31.11
In an exclusive interview with energyNOW! anchor Thalia Assuras, U.S. Energy Secretary Steven Chu says energy security concerns may help the Keystone XL oil-sands pipeline win approval.
Its certainly true that having Canada as a supplier for our oil is much more comforting than to have other countries supply our oil, Chu said in the interview, part of an energyNOW! special on Canadas oil sands and the Keystone XL pipeline debate which will air September 17 and 18 on Bloomberg Television and September 18 on WJLA ABC7 in Washington, D.C.
Its not perfect, but its a trade off, Chu said.
The proposed pipeline, currently under review by the U.S. State Department because it crosses the nation's border with Canada, would bring crude from Albertas oil sands to refineries on the U.S. Gulf coast. Chu is one of eight cabinet members advising Secretary of State Hillary Clinton on the project.
<snip>
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
31 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
![](du4img/smicon-reply-new.gif)
State Department has approved the #Keystone XL pipeline plan as being environmentally sound [View all]
beachmom
Mar 2013
OP
The only thing I remember Kerry saying was that he would wait until the report was issued
karynnj
Mar 2013
#6
Pretty sure he came into State knowing the deal was done, since it was done years ago.
blm
Mar 2013
#5
The problem is that they assume the project is viable at the same scale without the pipeline.
Mass
Mar 2013
#10
They don't care that they will destroy Kerry's legacy on environmental issues. Clinton's a user and
blm
Mar 2013
#12
Kerry does not have to approve of the project based on this report - and Obama can overrule a Kerry
karynnj
Mar 2013
#13
I just don't see it that way. I am certain Kerry accepted Sec of State KNOWING he'd
blm
Mar 2013
#14
I think there will be a lot of pressure on him - from Democarts and Republicans in Congress,
karynnj
Mar 2013
#15
Disagree. It would make the POTUS look weak if a member of his cabinet went a different
beachmom
Mar 2013
#22
It's standard ops for them. They know how to work the press to play both narratives at the same
blm
Mar 2013
#17
The question I have is which side leaked that she wanted to arm the Syrian rebels?
karynnj
Mar 2013
#18
Considering the choice of Moniz as Secretary of Energy, I guess this is a done deal.
Mass
Mar 2013
#19