John Kerry

likely to have an inside story. He did not like him in 2004 - and that never changed. I don't think he is RW - he may be neo con but I have never seen a positive JK article.

One example - it is Goldberg who was the one who wrote that Susan Rice as NSA is now Kerry's boss. This in fact is not true - even in the non-hierarchical way. Unless George Bush demoted Condi Rice from NSA to Secretary of State!

Every story he wrote of 2004 shows Kerry in a poor light - often using quotes from people (Biden) who likely would not have agreed.

The closest to a Kerry statement was a short comment answering a question when he turned in an absentee vote in Boston - sorry for the Boston Herald link. All it did was defend Obama and to speak of wanting a negotiated solution - http://bostonherald.com/news_opinion/local_politics/2013/06/john_kerry_in_town_to_vote_for_edward_markey

This was consistent with a Kerry statement in an article where it spoke of him speaking to the Russian foreign minister.

My guess is that this is an attempt to discredit Kerry and harm his ability to work on this issue diplomatically - after he was able to get Geneva 2 talked about again. Consider that the Obama administration did NOT agree to a no fly zone, but after the Murdock paper, the Wall Street Journal, printed that it was repeated by Putin.

I hope Obama (or Kerry and the General) deny the story if it is not true. I certainly hope it is false and it does seem out of character as there is no international backing for that and it would be an act of war.