Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

karynnj

(60,088 posts)
4. Great to hear
Thu Mar 15, 2012, 08:00 AM
Mar 2012

Last edited Thu Mar 15, 2012, 08:37 AM - Edit history (1)

This really is an issue where Kerry's approach has been one of trying to get people with the power to act to talk those affected and proposing common sense solutions. Far better than yelling that people need to be fired.

The South Coast Today has a really fascinating article that shows some of the underlying politics. The gist being that on Thursday, Kerry and Snowe signaled they were going to introduce their bill on Friday, which was delayed to Monday because the Senate ended the week on Thursday. http://www.southcoasttoday.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20120314/NEWS/203140329/-1/NEWS

What is fascinating is that while much is made of Brown not being included as a sponsor, Brown's own comments on Friday were not that he was supporting it:
"Brown visited the Foley Fish plant on the New Bedford waterfront Friday to stress that fishing policy remains a top priority. However, in response to a reporter's question about the Kerry-Snowe bill, he said only that he would "look at it." As much of the article seems to be trying to say that Brown was somehow not given sufficient recognition, that statement says it all. He is saying that on Friday he did not even know what was in the bill - which he signed on to by Monday.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»John Kerry»Kerry, Snowe, Rockefeller...»Reply #4