Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

YvonneCa

(10,117 posts)
9. You and Mass ought to post this discussion...
Wed Mar 28, 2012, 04:36 PM
Mar 2012

...in GD. Especially this part, karynnj:

"...the SC explains the uneven playing field in 2004 - almost as much as Bush being a war time President. It explains why the Catholic church was more active in 2004 than in 2008. Kerry would have picked at least 1 and possibly 3 judges - and this was known before the election. (Stevens likely would have retired earlier before the 2008 election.) (Obama replaced 2 judges, but they were both liberals - Kerry would have replaced at least one Conservative, Renquist - thus changing the balance of power.)

It also says that the court with its Bush vs Gore decision really made that determination."



EXCELLENT!

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»John Kerry»Photo of Kerry leaving th...»Reply #9