Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

karynnj

(60,088 posts)
7. The speech itself is clearly against forced modernity
Mon Apr 16, 2012, 08:03 AM
Apr 2012

It seems to me that he is speaking for working with the culture and accepting that they do not see the world as we do --- and then working with them. Given where he is and who he is, this IS someone arguing against forced modernity.

Not to mention, tribalism has NOT had 2 million years of success. Do you think the chaos of some of the remote tribal areas - try NW Pakistan or the Democratic Republic of the Congo are utopias or that the problems between the tribes are a function of the interaction with the west?

Not to mention, that the options are not black and white - a technology state with none of the culture and religion OR a nation which completely rejects any form of modernity. Even the example that you cite has plenty of counterexamples. Where nuclear power plants can't be all the things listed, there are technologies that DO have this potential. There have been articles where solar technology has provided power in remote areas to improve lives - and meets most of these criteria.

There is as much mythology of the "noble savage" as there is mythology that technology (or science) can solve all problems. Neither extreme is reasonable.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»John Kerry»Senator John Kerry says m...»Reply #7