More about Brown and the Boston Globe than Kerry, but thought there could be [View all]
interest. This is a long piece on Brown in the Senate. When I saw it, I dreaded that it would be another BG love letter to Brown. It actually is reasonably fair. What surprised me is that they actually put Brown's centerpiece legislation in context -
Within three days of a 60 Minutes broadcast that suggested some members of Congress were financially profiting from advance knowledge of government regulations, Brown introduced a measure blocking anyone in Congress from using nonpublic information to influence personal investments. Brown muscled his way into the headlines in a race against a fellow Senate freshman, Kirsten Gillibrand, a Democrat from New York who was drafting her own version of the same bill.
Brown has said that he does his homework and that he reads the bills that come before Congress. But in this instance, Browns measure was so hastily drafted that it contained exact language lifted from an earlier House bill on the same subject. And even after Browns draft was set aside by the Homeland Security Committee in favor of another version, Brown continued to claim credit in an encounter with President Obama. In January, Brown intercepted the president as he departed the House after his State of the Union speech.
My insider trading bill is on Harrys desk right now, Brown told the president, referring to Reid. Tell him to get it out. Its ready to go.
<snip>
It stretches credibility for Brown to claim the act as his own, said Wendy Schiller, an associate professor of political science at Brown University. But the rookie showed a quick response and deft footwork that could help him rack up more significant achievements if Massachusetts voters decide to send him back to the Senate for a full term.
http://articles.boston.com/2012-05-20/news/31790349_1_senate-floor-financial-regulatory-overhaul-republican-moderates/7
The second half of the last paragraph really does not match the first 3 and a half quoted. The fact is that the Gillibrand bill was better and had far more sponsors (including Kerry).
The other thing is that Brown's behavior with the President was atrocious. The President had already called for such a bill. It was a "live shot" move if there ever was one. The fact is that this was opportunistic - Gillibrand also based hers on the House bill - but credited the two House reps who wrote it. ( 60 minutes covered the lack of success the House bill was having - leading to it getting tons of sponsors overnight.)
It is also interesting that they use that incredibly incoherent speech as the frame - though they have various references of him charm and political talent - then they mention he is really not close to any other Senator.