Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Xipe Totec

(44,197 posts)
1. Statement by the President on H.R. 1540
Sun Jun 17, 2012, 11:44 PM
Jun 2012

Section 1021 affirms the executive branch's authority to detain persons covered by the 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF) (Public Law 107-40; 50 U.S.C. 1541 note). This section breaks no new ground and is unnecessary. The authority it describes was included in the 2001 AUMF, as recognized by the Supreme Court and confirmed through lower court decisions since then. Two critical limitations in section 1021 confirm that it solely codifies established authorities. First, under section 1021(d), the bill does not "limit or expand the authority of the President or the scope of the Authorization for Use of Military Force." Second, under section 1021(e), the bill may not be construed to affect any "existing law or authorities relating to the detention of United States citizens, lawful resident aliens of the United States, or any other persons who are captured or arrested in the United States." My Administration strongly supported the inclusion of these limitations in order to make clear beyond doubt that the legislation does nothing more than confirm authorities that the Federal courts have recognized as lawful under the 2001 AUMF. Moreover, I want to clarify that my Administration will not authorize the indefinite military detention without trial of American citizens. Indeed, I believe that doing so would break with our most important traditions and values as a Nation. My Administration will interpret section 1021 in a manner that ensures that any detention it authorizes complies with the Constitution, the laws of war, and all other applicable law.

http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2011/12/31/statement-president-hr-1540

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Statement by the President on H.R. 1540 Xipe Totec Jun 2012 #1
The references to "my admin" aren't reassuring to me, personally. snot Jun 2012 #2
Thanks Noisy Democrat Jun 2012 #3
thank you for giving us that vitally important information, Xipe Totec. nt nofurylike Jun 2012 #5
Thanks! I still find the text confusing, but this is a helpful link n/t Noisy Democrat Jun 2012 #13
we are all criminals in the eyes of our elected leadership, subject to drone execution. ya? nt msongs Jun 2012 #4
No. TheWraith Jun 2012 #8
Well, for the text of the amendments and legislation, try these: Make7 Jun 2012 #6
Thanks! n/t Noisy Democrat Jun 2012 #12
Well, now I've learned something about linking to Thomas Noisy Democrat Jun 2012 #14
The NDAA explicitly says US citizens and lawful residents are not subject to military detention. TheWraith Jun 2012 #7
No one claims that section 1022 applies to US citizens. eomer Jun 2012 #9
As somebody who lived in Europe, I cannot succeed getting worked up by things like that. Mass Jun 2012 #10
But we're not supposed to have to trust our government Noisy Democrat Jun 2012 #11
The government is supposed to represent us, so we should trust it Mass Jun 2012 #15
Fifty years old is young? Noisy Democrat Jun 2012 #16
Not sure why, but I though you were much younger than I am. Mass Jun 2012 #18
Can you help me find the amendments? Noisy Democrat Jun 2012 #19
I'm sure he did have good reasons to vote yes Noisy Democrat Jun 2012 #21
p.s. How should we be fixing it? Noisy Democrat Jun 2012 #17
By having a true discussion on issues. Mass Jun 2012 #20
Another update: The famous Levin video was a hoax Noisy Democrat Jun 2012 #22
Is this related to the Occupy movement Denver Dave Sep 2012 #23
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»John Kerry»Senator Kerry and the NDA...»Reply #1