Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Men's Group

In reply to the discussion: Comedic double standards [View all]

caseymoz

(5,763 posts)
33. If threats were perceived rationally . . .
Tue Jul 17, 2012, 10:31 AM
Jul 2012

. . . nobody would bluff, would they?

Try being in a crowded room where somebody begins to scream insults and threats to you. Other people are there. They perceive it. There's zero chance that he's going to be able to rip your eyes out and skull fuck you. Yet, when you hear it, you're body is going to begin to react as though it can happen. The stress hormones are hard on the body and brain.

I'm certain as Tosh made the remark, this woman did not perceive the chance that five guys would get up and rape her. However, I'm also certain her perception of reality was altered when the crowd laughed. How could she have expected that? In the immediate moment, he's shown that he has authority, he's in control. Now why wouldn't possibility of rape, if not right there, then when she left, seem real? And, having watched Tosh, I suspect that's exactly the kind of effect he wanted to have on her.

Not to mention the fact that Tosh showed her that the world is more threatening than she thought. They laugh at the possibility of her being sexually assaulted.

Granted, Tosh was bluffing. For anyone sitting outside that crowd, there's no way he could have meant to carry it out. I guess to be technically correct, I'd have to say it was a bluff not a joke. Nevertheless for a bluff to work, it has to perceived on some psychological level as a threat.

Comedic double standards [View all] 4th law of robotics Jul 2012 OP
My first OP here 4th law of robotics Jul 2012 #1
to be honest, I find both scenarios to be repugnant maddezmom Jul 2012 #2
I agree with you there. Nt Warren DeMontague Jul 2012 #3
I agree with you. Thank you. I would like to ask OP about part of the OP though. uppityperson Jul 2012 #19
My intent 4th law of robotics Jul 2012 #22
Thank you. Rape can and often does result in permanent physical damage as well as psychological uppityperson Jul 2012 #24
Yeah, I'm not seeing a double standard here. I'm seeing two examples of repugnant behavior. yardwork Jul 2012 #20
The double standard would be in the public response to both instances 4th law of robotics Jul 2012 #23
In that case, the overwhelming guilt is on those who are silent in the face of female oppression. yardwork Jul 2012 #27
Not DU 4th law of robotics Jul 2012 #28
That's your argument. You're saying that it's hypocritical of people to disagree with Tosh's words yardwork Jul 2012 #30
Ok . . . so where is the petition 4th law of robotics Jul 2012 #31
When did this episode of The Talk air? How do you know there wasn't a petition at the time? yardwork Jul 2012 #32
Exactly my point 4th law of robotics Jul 2012 #34
Whatever. /nt yardwork Jul 2012 #36
"Something you say when you know you're in the wrong but can't admit it it?" 4th law of robotics Jul 2012 #37
Here's something to get outraged over. This is something we can all agree is wrong: yardwork Jul 2012 #38
O . . . k . . . 4th law of robotics Jul 2012 #39
The justification, as with Solanis, is that it is "brilliant, necessary satire" Warren DeMontague Jul 2012 #4
After reading william's Op (which I'm sorry to see he's deleted) lumberjack_jeff Jul 2012 #5
OT, I was sorry to see him delete the OP, too. Warren DeMontague Jul 2012 #7
I think this clip does fall to the same low standard as a rape joke, but Squinch Jul 2012 #6
I think the rape comments were way out of line, and I would agree, more egregious in many ways. Warren DeMontague Jul 2012 #8
Could the double standard be because of how often each happens in real life? Squinch Jul 2012 #9
Maybe, but there are a lot of horrible things that happen pretty rarely. Warren DeMontague Jul 2012 #11
A woman being raped by 5 guys in a comedy club is pretty rare . . . 4th law of robotics Jul 2012 #12
But a woman being raped by 5 guys when we don't specify the location is not that rare Squinch Jul 2012 #16
Actually that's still pretty rare. 4th law of robotics Jul 2012 #17
I think, again, you're ignoring the implied or assumed acceptability of the comments Warren DeMontague Jul 2012 #18
Because some women, like some men, like some people, are insensitive, or jerks, or not thinking uppityperson Jul 2012 #21
We agree 100%. Warren DeMontague Jul 2012 #25
Tosh was as out of line as Michael Richards ProudToBeBlueInRhody Jul 2012 #10
Nothing is off the table in comedy. MrSlayer Jul 2012 #13
pretty much my feeling as well. comedy should be cutting ans sometimes offensive loli phabay Jul 2012 #15
Hey, I "thought we were done with Tosh"? ProudToBeBlueInRhody Jul 2012 #14
Men should complain more. caseymoz Jul 2012 #26
How was it a threat? 4th law of robotics Jul 2012 #29
If threats were perceived rationally . . . caseymoz Jul 2012 #33
"I'm certain as Tosh made the remark, this woman did not perceive the chance that five guys . . . " 4th law of robotics Jul 2012 #35
See it your own way, then. caseymoz Jul 2012 #40
On open mic night . . . 4th law of robotics Jul 2012 #41
I certainly do see one . . . caseymoz Jul 2012 #44
I disagree. I think what Tosh dd was borderline incitement. Warren DeMontague Jul 2012 #42
I wouldn't say it rises to that level 4th law of robotics Jul 2012 #43
There was a very interesting article in today's NYT hifiguy Jul 2012 #45
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Men's Group»Comedic double standards»Reply #33