Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Men's Group

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)

3. fathers live thru their sons, also.

Reply to 4th law of robotics (Reply #2)

Tue Aug 21, 2012, 11:53 AM

Aug 2012

i did a thread a while ago that shows the moms are the most influential in their childrens (including sons) sexist attitude.

i have no need to shy away from our responsibility as women. or mothers. children are my priority.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/1139154

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

31 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Do men need to play more of a role in stopping mothers from sexualizing daughters? [View all] Bonobo Aug 2012 OP

Absolutely yes. lumberjack_jeff Aug 2012 #1

Those shows do seem to consist of a mother and daughter 4th law of robotics Aug 2012 #2

fathers live thru their sons, also. seabeyond Aug 2012 #3

Seems we should work on tearing down the sexist matriarchy then 4th law of robotics Aug 2012 #4

you do not get the way it works, obviously. and i do not need to rethink seabeyond Aug 2012 #5

Your group talks about society incessantly 4th law of robotics Aug 2012 #6

on post 2 you had to throw in a totally bogus jab. that is what i was addressing. now seabeyond Aug 2012 #7

How is it a totally bogus jab? 4th law of robotics Aug 2012 #9

this should have been an easy agreement. outta here. parenting to do. nt seabeyond Aug 2012 #10

I don't think "your group" is a useful basis for discussion. n/t lumberjack_jeff Aug 2012 #8

Oh I know 4th law of robotics Aug 2012 #11

and yours isn't? jarred222 Aug 2012 #12

Then I suggest you avoid both. Warren DeMontague Aug 2012 #14

Why? This amuses me. jarred222 Aug 2012 #16

Consider that an official warning. Warren DeMontague Aug 2012 #17

Post removed Post removed Aug 2012 #21

Wonder who this is.... ProudToBeBlueInRhody Aug 2012 #23

He sounds vaguely familiar. lumberjack_jeff Aug 2012 #25

Found it! Warren DeMontague Aug 2012 #26

A) I never claimed that I represented anyone by myself 4th law of robotics Aug 2012 #18

Both groups espouse gender essentialism. jarred222 Aug 2012 #22

No that's not true 4th law of robotics Aug 2012 #24

What you define as "sexism" most people here consider to be normal adult physical attraction. Warren DeMontague Aug 2012 #15

I could never be involved in any way, shape, or form with anyone who would think that shit was okay. Warren DeMontague Aug 2012 #13

There is a custody battle going on here, so all bets are off... TreasonousBastard Aug 2012 #19

I'm guessing the fathers that are present "accept it" in the same sense 4th law of robotics Aug 2012 #20

This message was self-deleted by its author seaglass Aug 2012 #27

Motivation 4th law of robotics Aug 2012 #28

This message was self-deleted by its author seaglass Aug 2012 #29

There really isn't a lot of money in these pageants 4th law of robotics Aug 2012 #30

This message was self-deleted by its author seaglass Aug 2012 #31