Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Men's Group

4th law of robotics

(6,801 posts)

24. No that's not true

Reply to jarred222 (Reply #22)

Wed Aug 22, 2012, 03:22 PM

Aug 2012

I've never seen anyone here claim men are better than women or are the only gender worth considering.

I have seen members of a certain other forum supporting statements calling for a genocide against males and cheering on people who claim to hate all men. But that sort of thing (in reverse presumably) doesn't fly here.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

31 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Do men need to play more of a role in stopping mothers from sexualizing daughters? [View all] Bonobo Aug 2012 OP

Absolutely yes. lumberjack_jeff Aug 2012 #1

Those shows do seem to consist of a mother and daughter 4th law of robotics Aug 2012 #2

fathers live thru their sons, also. seabeyond Aug 2012 #3

Seems we should work on tearing down the sexist matriarchy then 4th law of robotics Aug 2012 #4

you do not get the way it works, obviously. and i do not need to rethink seabeyond Aug 2012 #5

Your group talks about society incessantly 4th law of robotics Aug 2012 #6

on post 2 you had to throw in a totally bogus jab. that is what i was addressing. now seabeyond Aug 2012 #7

How is it a totally bogus jab? 4th law of robotics Aug 2012 #9

this should have been an easy agreement. outta here. parenting to do. nt seabeyond Aug 2012 #10

I don't think "your group" is a useful basis for discussion. n/t lumberjack_jeff Aug 2012 #8

Oh I know 4th law of robotics Aug 2012 #11

and yours isn't? jarred222 Aug 2012 #12

Then I suggest you avoid both. Warren DeMontague Aug 2012 #14

Why? This amuses me. jarred222 Aug 2012 #16

Consider that an official warning. Warren DeMontague Aug 2012 #17

Post removed Post removed Aug 2012 #21

Wonder who this is.... ProudToBeBlueInRhody Aug 2012 #23

He sounds vaguely familiar. lumberjack_jeff Aug 2012 #25

Found it! Warren DeMontague Aug 2012 #26

A) I never claimed that I represented anyone by myself 4th law of robotics Aug 2012 #18

Both groups espouse gender essentialism. jarred222 Aug 2012 #22

No that's not true 4th law of robotics Aug 2012 #24

What you define as "sexism" most people here consider to be normal adult physical attraction. Warren DeMontague Aug 2012 #15

I could never be involved in any way, shape, or form with anyone who would think that shit was okay. Warren DeMontague Aug 2012 #13

There is a custody battle going on here, so all bets are off... TreasonousBastard Aug 2012 #19

I'm guessing the fathers that are present "accept it" in the same sense 4th law of robotics Aug 2012 #20

This message was self-deleted by its author seaglass Aug 2012 #27

Motivation 4th law of robotics Aug 2012 #28

This message was self-deleted by its author seaglass Aug 2012 #29

There really isn't a lot of money in these pageants 4th law of robotics Aug 2012 #30

This message was self-deleted by its author seaglass Aug 2012 #31