Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Men's Group

(33,224 posts)

9. Yes. The optimum human being is Nadia Suleman.

Sun Aug 26, 2012, 09:40 AM

Aug 2012

But it's a useful splash of cold water onto the face of those of us who still think that men are atop some sort of hierarchy.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

14 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

NYTimes: Men, Who Needs Them? [View all] marginlized Aug 2012 OP

Someone needs to retake biology 101 4th law of robotics Aug 2012 #1

Didn't you know that women can reproduce by budding? nt Bonobo Aug 2012 #2

Girl Power! 4th law of robotics Aug 2012 #3

I can't begin to say how much I dislike this article. MadrasT Aug 2012 #4

That's another good point 4th law of robotics Aug 2012 #5

Right there with you on that. n/t MadrasT Aug 2012 #6

Yes. The optimum human being is Nadia Suleman. lumberjack_jeff Aug 2012 #9

Excuse me while i not give a shit. Warren DeMontague Aug 2012 #7

The distance between CAN and SHOULD is measured in units of wisdom... ElboRuum Aug 2012 #11

I heard an interesting comment on this. 4th law of robotics Aug 2012 #10

That's why some groups felt the need to redefine sexism 4th law of robotics Sep 2012 #14

On occasion.... discntnt_irny_srcsm Aug 2012 #12