Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

4th law of robotics

(6,801 posts)
2. This does hurt the whole "male-privilege" argument
Fri Sep 14, 2012, 01:34 PM
Sep 2012

to continue to assert that one would have to assume A) mothers are unaware of the world they are bringing their child in to or B) they want their child to be placed at a significant disadvantage and suffer for it.

I don't think it'd be easy to support either of those claims.

It would be like using the fact that black babies are generally considered less desirable when it comes to adoption (not my opinion, just based on adoption statistics) as proof that blacks are privileged. They're unwanted, of course that means they have it good!

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

The conclusions are unavoidable. lumberjack_jeff Sep 2012 #1
This does hurt the whole "male-privilege" argument 4th law of robotics Sep 2012 #2
I don't like this sex selection practice. Pterodactyl Sep 2012 #3
Seems to me.... ProudToBeBlueInRhody Sep 2012 #4
If it's simply a factor of the gender choosing preferring a child of the same sex 4th law of robotics Sep 2012 #5
True. This leads down a dangerous path. Pterodactyl Sep 2012 #6
Two things: One, knowing a lot of actual, real-world parents, not the kind that exist in the, say, Warren DeMontague Sep 2012 #13
Then what explains the sex ratio in China? lumberjack_jeff Sep 2012 #7
Come on now.... ProudToBeBlueInRhody Sep 2012 #10
Parents in the US prefer daughters. lumberjack_jeff Sep 2012 #11
Are you saying there wasn't a time.... ProudToBeBlueInRhody Sep 2012 #12
I'm saying that in China, having daughters is STILL frowned upon. lumberjack_jeff Sep 2012 #17
Because.... ProudToBeBlueInRhody Sep 2012 #19
There is no government imposition to not have female children in china 4th law of robotics Sep 2012 #16
Well, whichever.... ProudToBeBlueInRhody Sep 2012 #20
In that country boys are more valued for social and economic reasons 4th law of robotics Sep 2012 #22
See, I disagree. Warren DeMontague Sep 2012 #14
I think there are enough now to make it noticeable ProudToBeBlueInRhody Sep 2012 #18
I don't see it being a real problem. Warren DeMontague Sep 2012 #21
The linked article is bullshitty, short on any real data. Warren Stupidity Sep 2012 #8
Is the world of Gattaca just around the corner? ElboRuum Sep 2012 #9
Me watching that movie: "Marin Civic Center! W00t!" Warren DeMontague Sep 2012 #15
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Men's Group»Gender based selection in...»Reply #2