Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

lumberjack_jeff

(33,224 posts)
8. I don't think that is significantly meaningful, and here's why.
Tue Nov 6, 2012, 06:58 PM
Nov 2012

Differences in type of compensation (monetary vs nonmonetary) appear to make a difference in the career choices that men and women make; (men choose jobs based almost exclusively on monetary considerations, while women give weight to other factors - see the "work/life balance" thread).

... but this bias shows up as pay differential between various careers. I would expect a teacher with X education, with Y experience, working Z hours per year to pay the same regardless of gender, but not necessarily be the same as the pay rate for electricians. The fact that the teaching offers time off, family-friendly schedule and good benefits tends to attract women who express a preference for those non-monetary factors.

The 7% difference does take into account the difference in pay rate between teaching and electrical engineering... but not the tendency for men to negotiate for salary.

That said, there are probably some variations in pay rate for individual electrical engineers which reflect these preferences (one can take the EE job with the flexible schedule and the better insurance OR the one with higher pay rate.)

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Wage Gap Myth Exposed -- By Feminists [View all] 4th law of robotics Nov 2012 OP
AAUW's previous study of the issue in 2007 came to a similar conclusion - 7% lumberjack_jeff Nov 2012 #1
If you have a convenient scapegoat like the "patriarchy" you can still disregard the study Major Nikon Nov 2012 #3
The author makes a good case rrneck Nov 2012 #2
When even that AAUW is forced to concede, grudgingly 4th law of robotics Nov 2012 #5
If you consider total compensation, rather than just wages, the difference becomes even smaller Major Nikon Nov 2012 #4
It's almost as if differences in personal preferences are driving any wage gap 4th law of robotics Nov 2012 #6
They wouldn't be very fucking smart bosses if that were the case Major Nikon Nov 2012 #11
Indeed. Any sane boss would jump at the chance 4th law of robotics Nov 2012 #12
I don't think that is significantly meaningful, and here's why. lumberjack_jeff Nov 2012 #8
I'm not sure most studies look at it that way Major Nikon Nov 2012 #10
I wonder how long before it starts going the other way... Hemp_is_good Nov 2012 #13
It already has Major Nikon Nov 2012 #14
I am 100% certain that if women end up earning more than men 4th law of robotics Nov 2012 #15
It will be a long time before it is considered appropriate to even investigate. lumberjack_jeff Nov 2012 #16
Who wants to look at the facts and details or minutia of an issue when it just feels jp11 Nov 2012 #7
Disagreeing proves you support women being paid less than men 4th law of robotics Nov 2012 #9
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Men's Group»Wage Gap Myth Exposed -- ...»Reply #8