Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Major Nikon

(36,917 posts)
7. I doubt they are going to come up with anything I haven't already seen
Sat Nov 10, 2012, 10:32 AM
Nov 2012

My personal standard is that there are just certain words I don't use because I feel they serve no purpose other than to divide. That's the standard I keep for myself. I don't push that on other people nor am I quick to judge them if they feel differently.

There are some on DU who pretend to know if people on DU are misogynists or not, which is a pretty strong charge if you think about it (I suspect they don't much). When you get right down to it, it's a pretty good trick to 'know' someone simply based on what they post on a message board. You might have your suspicions, but knowing with any certainty who they hate? All they are doing is revealing how much they don't know yet pretend to know. I've known people who throw around all manner of gender stereotypes, yet were fully committed to actually doing real things about gender inequality (besides just writing about it on a message board). I've also known people who were the worst sort of no-shit misogynists you can imagine, but you'd never know it from their language. Well guess what? It's not the blowhards people should be worried about. It's those who keep their hate internalized and simmering just below the surface, and then one day they decide they've had enough and act on it.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Sounds like you're just overcompensating for a small dick. Bonobo Nov 2012 #1
Maybe that's why I keep getting told size doesn't matter Major Nikon Nov 2012 #2
THAT's an outright lie... Hemp_is_good Nov 2012 #3
I haven't seen too many prosthetic penes that come in small sizes Major Nikon Nov 2012 #8
rofl no idea what i can say to the sheer brilliance of this retort. loli phabay Nov 2012 #4
Some instruments play one note, and one note only. Warren DeMontague Nov 2012 #5
The double standard is rather glaring. I wonder if the usual outraged 4th law of robotics Nov 2012 #6
I doubt they are going to come up with anything I haven't already seen Major Nikon Nov 2012 #7
The only overt and habitual sexism I've seen on here 4th law of robotics Nov 2012 #9
Here's what you most often get as a response to calling them on that... Major Nikon Nov 2012 #10
Case in point (seen on DU) Major Nikon Nov 2012 #11
Bad example... Hemp_is_good Nov 2012 #12
If calling a man a dick isn't sexist, then calling a woman a cunt isn't sexist either Major Nikon Nov 2012 #13
Really? We're really going to sink to their level of ultra sensitivity? Hemp_is_good Nov 2012 #14
I don't think asking for a single standard is "ultra sensitive" 4th law of robotics Nov 2012 #15
But women can't be hypocrites on DU Hemp_is_good Nov 2012 #18
It has nothing to do with what anyone is sensitive about Major Nikon Nov 2012 #16
Please don't get me wrong I understand your point Hemp_is_good Nov 2012 #17
This has actually been a subject that is political football even within the feminist community Major Nikon Nov 2012 #19
I have a problem with the idea that certain words=sexism. lumberjack_jeff Nov 2012 #21
You do realize that nobody actually gives a shit about all this... TreasonousBastard Nov 2012 #20
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Men's Group»The idea that sexism only...»Reply #7