Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TreasonousBastard

(43,049 posts)
20. You do realize that nobody actually gives a shit about all this...
Thu Nov 15, 2012, 10:24 AM
Nov 2012

it's working well enough as it is it for now and would involve thinking it through, which is hard to do when you're spending so much time complaining in "safe haven" groups. (Why are there 5 women's groups anyway?) I suspect that at the moment women have the upper hand in this because they have been real victims so many times that playing the victim card works well for them.

My point has always been that for true gender equality we have to give up the silly stuff-- like avoiding mentioning certain body parts. However, people have been banned here for saying "Nice tits" and not showing a picture of cute little birds. Vaginas? forgeddaboudit. I am bemused by how much time and effort, to say nothing of money, is spent making those things on women's chests so firm and perky but how we are not to look or comment on them. Whatever is the point, then?

It would probably be better if body parts were left out of the conversation, but, if you want to run for President, run a major company, be a firefighter, join the combat arms in the military... that's great, but you can't continue to hide behind 19th Century propriety.

It's not the sort of thing that can be finely defined, but we have to accept the difference between "that bitch" and "the bitches". One is a descriptor for a nasty shrew and the other is a slur on all women and some people get stuck in the confusion over the two.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Sounds like you're just overcompensating for a small dick. Bonobo Nov 2012 #1
Maybe that's why I keep getting told size doesn't matter Major Nikon Nov 2012 #2
THAT's an outright lie... Hemp_is_good Nov 2012 #3
I haven't seen too many prosthetic penes that come in small sizes Major Nikon Nov 2012 #8
rofl no idea what i can say to the sheer brilliance of this retort. loli phabay Nov 2012 #4
Some instruments play one note, and one note only. Warren DeMontague Nov 2012 #5
The double standard is rather glaring. I wonder if the usual outraged 4th law of robotics Nov 2012 #6
I doubt they are going to come up with anything I haven't already seen Major Nikon Nov 2012 #7
The only overt and habitual sexism I've seen on here 4th law of robotics Nov 2012 #9
Here's what you most often get as a response to calling them on that... Major Nikon Nov 2012 #10
Case in point (seen on DU) Major Nikon Nov 2012 #11
Bad example... Hemp_is_good Nov 2012 #12
If calling a man a dick isn't sexist, then calling a woman a cunt isn't sexist either Major Nikon Nov 2012 #13
Really? We're really going to sink to their level of ultra sensitivity? Hemp_is_good Nov 2012 #14
I don't think asking for a single standard is "ultra sensitive" 4th law of robotics Nov 2012 #15
But women can't be hypocrites on DU Hemp_is_good Nov 2012 #18
It has nothing to do with what anyone is sensitive about Major Nikon Nov 2012 #16
Please don't get me wrong I understand your point Hemp_is_good Nov 2012 #17
This has actually been a subject that is political football even within the feminist community Major Nikon Nov 2012 #19
I have a problem with the idea that certain words=sexism. lumberjack_jeff Nov 2012 #21
You do realize that nobody actually gives a shit about all this... TreasonousBastard Nov 2012 #20
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Men's Group»The idea that sexism only...»Reply #20