Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Men's Group
In reply to the discussion: International Day for the Elimination of Violence against men [View all]lumberjack_jeff
(33,224 posts)37. On the internet I'm indifferent to people. Points of argument, I can either like or dislike.
The argument that men are immune to victimization is one that I strongly oppose. It doesn't matter to me who also holds that view, or that it is or is not a majority viewpoint.
You have planted your flag with the view that victimization of men isn't a significant problem because men are most commonly their victimizers. It is a guilt by association argument I strongly dislike. The same argument has been used to diminish the problem of inner city crime.
And WdM is right that this group should be about issues... not about DU, its members or its other groups.
I disagree with the view you put forward, but it sounds as if it was mainly intended as a way to defile a recent grave. And frankly I think one grave dancers support group is enough.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
78 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/726f9/726f9d2d1a621cd2ca5064510c33faeb32aa157f" alt=""
International Day for the Elimination of Violence against men [View all]
4th law of robotics
Nov 2012
OP
The total lack of any self examination within this group is not amazing at all.
Warren Stupidity
Nov 2012
#16
He is a troll because he was shitcanned the fuck out of du for being a troll.
Warren Stupidity
Nov 2012
#24
Undeniably, more women are injured by physically violent men than the reverse. n/t
lumberjack_jeff
Dec 2012
#78
In a heterosexual relationship, IPV is more likely to be initiated by the woman.
lumberjack_jeff
Nov 2012
#30
violent people would have to change the most. as in, people who are violent.
Warren DeMontague
Nov 2012
#19
I think he is saying, rightly, that violent people are violent whether men or women.
Bonobo
Nov 2012
#25
"To you, the very mention of violence against men is a ludicrous embarrassment"
Warren Stupidity
Nov 2012
#34
On the internet I'm indifferent to people. Points of argument, I can either like or dislike.
lumberjack_jeff
Nov 2012
#37
That is a certainly an authoritative sounding statement, I will grant you that.
Warren DeMontague
Nov 2012
#35
Do you know that that stat correlates to the proportion of young males in the population?
Warren Stupidity
Nov 2012
#38
For the sake of argument, let's accept for a moment that what you say is true.
lumberjack_jeff
Nov 2012
#47
I have to assume it's something you're demanding I say, that I'm *not* saying, thats making you mad.
Warren DeMontague
Nov 2012
#48
Also. Tell me something: From a, I guess it would be, sociological perspective?
Warren DeMontague
Nov 2012
#49
The problem with your theory is it just doesn't prove itself in the real world
Major Nikon
Nov 2012
#43
Why do you almost always have to conflate sexism with racism to make your arguments?
Major Nikon
Dec 2012
#73