Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ZombieHorde

(29,047 posts)
11. Hmmm...
Tue Feb 12, 2013, 03:46 PM
Feb 2013
If one wants to say "traditional gender roles", one can just say that.

To blame it on "The Patriarchy" is to accept a particular, narrow narrative promulgated by folks with a definite agenda.


I think this is actually a good rhetorical call. I think I will use other words and phrases when outside of school.

It totally ignores the biggest elephant in the room- religion- for one.


You're preaching to the choir on that one. (pun intended)

I note, however, that "gender is an artificial, meaningless construct" seems to be this week's talking point, sort of how "men can't be feminists" was the talking point a few weeks ago.


I agree with that, but I think almost everything is meaningless.

Which begs the question: If gender doesn't exist, how are "we" supposed to know who is "allowed" to call themselves Feminists, and who isn't?


Short answer: I don't know.
Longer answer: There are actually many different types of feminism, so when someone says, "I am a feminist," we don't really know what they believe and don't believe. I don't think any one group of feminists can be considered the real feminists, just like no one group of Christians can claim to be the real Christians. When I took my first women's studies class, one of the first things our professor told us was that social movements are very messy, and not always universally, clearly defined. OWS is a fantastic example of that.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Yep. This is one of the reasons patriarchy sucks. ZombieHorde Feb 2013 #1
I don't see how the stereotype that boys are inferior is attributable to patriarchy. DavidDvorkin Feb 2013 #2
A large part of patriarchy is assigned gender roles. ZombieHorde Feb 2013 #3
So basically "patriarchy" is a catch-all label to describe anything you don't like. Warren DeMontague Feb 2013 #5
I have said nothing of the sort, but feel free to believe whatever you can ZombieHorde Feb 2013 #7
And yet, when it was widely assumed that girls were academically inferior, that was "patriarchy",too Warren DeMontague Feb 2013 #8
If patriarchy was a "nefarious penis conspiracy," ZombieHorde Feb 2013 #9
If one wants to say "traditional gender roles", one can just say that. Warren DeMontague Feb 2013 #10
Hmmm... ZombieHorde Feb 2013 #11
Everyone should be get at least a cursory grounding in Korzybyski & General Semantics, IMHO Warren DeMontague Feb 2013 #13
I don't even think "traditional" is an operative word. lumberjack_jeff Feb 2013 #15
Nefarious Penis Conspiracy opened for The Reverand Horton Heat at the Paradise in Boston in '93 ProudToBeBlueInRhody Feb 2013 #12
Yes, but the flyers around town were epic. nt ZombieHorde Feb 2013 #14
while assuring them that girls and boys are equally academic may help them achieve. seabeyond Feb 2013 #4
I think all kids are different, and respond to different stuff. Warren DeMontague Feb 2013 #6
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Men's Group»Negative stereotypes abou...»Reply #11