Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Men's Group

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)

2. Oh, absolutely. These people are off in the happy hills with the wee folk.

Reply to MrSlayer (Reply #1)

Sat Mar 16, 2013, 08:56 PM

Mar 2013

Still, it's vile, horrible bigotry which should be called out IMHO. Definitely not celebrated with a wink, a nod, or a "smile".

Nazis, Fred Phelps's gang... they're crazy, hate-filled minorities; but that doesn't mean they shouldn't be criticized. Certainly no one would promote their ideas or blogs on a progressive site such as this.

And no, I most absolutely do not confuse these ramblings with anything resembling real "Feminism", mainstream or no, of which I consider myself a member.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

21 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

...Just don't suggest that "Misandry" is actually, you know, a thing. [View all] Warren DeMontague Mar 2013 OP

This is just lunacy. MrSlayer Mar 2013 #1

Oh, absolutely. These people are off in the happy hills with the wee folk. Warren DeMontague Mar 2013 #2

Yes, it's not brilliant satire. n/t lumberjack_jeff Mar 2013 #6

"They shouldn't be confused with actual, mainstream feminists" Bonobo Mar 2013 #4

Would the people in question call themselves feminists? lumberjack_jeff Mar 2013 #5

neofeminism sigmasix Mar 2013 #3

neofeminist? more like anachrofeminist Sen. Walter Sobchak Mar 2013 #7

This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague Mar 2013 #8

Unlocking. I think this is important given the discussion of "MRA views" and the like in GD. Warren DeMontague Apr 2013 #9

Here are some FACTS. I invite everyone concerned to "fact check me"- get it? Warren DeMontague Apr 2013 #10

-continued- .. so why is this relevant? Warren DeMontague Apr 2013 #11

No, no, no.. remember.. opiate69 Apr 2013 #12

my favorite is when the people who consistently break the most basic site rules Warren DeMontague Apr 2013 #13

Yep.. and I`m seeing a fuckton of "DU sux" lately.. opiate69 Apr 2013 #15

Bashing Skinner seems to be a hobby as well Hayabusa Apr 2013 #14

Wow theKed Apr 2013 #18

Magnum opus. lumberjack_jeff Apr 2013 #20

last time around, the blogger known as "sargasso sea" came back... as "sargasso sea" Warren DeMontague Apr 2013 #21

Part #3: okay, so we're not supposed to notice what the comments, there, say. Warren DeMontague Apr 2013 #16

Didn't you hear? opiate69 Apr 2013 #17

So if the poster who made the reference to the comments wants to clairfy, this would be a good place Warren DeMontague Apr 2013 #19