Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
11. -continued- .. so why is this relevant?
Wed Apr 3, 2013, 03:42 PM
Apr 2013

because these games, around repeat disruptors, zombies, sock puppets and yes, the ever-popular "shared account" where a password is passed around like a note in the back of the class...

....they've been going on for a long time, on DU. They were known about on DU2. One good thing about the experiment which was meta, was that it allowed some very good documentation on these things to be done out in the open.

(In keeping with the idea that DU members are here to be "educated", right?)

So the radfem hub community is, maybe, 10 people tops. One or two of whom has repeatedly admitted to an obsession with trolling DU. The views and statements of the radfem hub bloggers, including the FCM blogger, are likewise well known. Again, to pretend that the extreme stuff in the comments of that one post are an outlier, are ridiculous- especially when at the top of her page right now there is an anti-trans post, and one of her favorite topics to rail on is the idea that women can't possibly ever enjoy intercourse with males, and any feelings women may have for men are merely a result of "trauma bonding".

To argue that any of this material belongs on DU, ever, is ridiculous- especially since, like I said, the history around this group is well known, as they were behind several very large meta threads last year. Likewise, given the fact that very few people pay attention to this group outside themselves, it's a little disingenuous to imagine that it's falling from the sky as "important internet Feminist commentary". If people think it's a coincidence that the material shows up repeatedly just like the repeat disruptors do, I have a bridge to sell them.

And if people are flailing all over themselves- again- to pretend that things like exposing blog posts where zombies and socks brag about repeatedly disrupting DU is somehow "overzealous troll hunting" like a dog with a bone... right, give me a break.

Or maybe ask why that is.

The dog part might be right.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

This is just lunacy. MrSlayer Mar 2013 #1
Oh, absolutely. These people are off in the happy hills with the wee folk. Warren DeMontague Mar 2013 #2
Yes, it's not brilliant satire. n/t lumberjack_jeff Mar 2013 #6
"They shouldn't be confused with actual, mainstream feminists" Bonobo Mar 2013 #4
Would the people in question call themselves feminists? lumberjack_jeff Mar 2013 #5
neofeminism sigmasix Mar 2013 #3
neofeminist? more like anachrofeminist Sen. Walter Sobchak Mar 2013 #7
This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague Mar 2013 #8
Unlocking. I think this is important given the discussion of "MRA views" and the like in GD. Warren DeMontague Apr 2013 #9
Here are some FACTS. I invite everyone concerned to "fact check me"- get it? Warren DeMontague Apr 2013 #10
-continued- .. so why is this relevant? Warren DeMontague Apr 2013 #11
No, no, no.. remember.. opiate69 Apr 2013 #12
my favorite is when the people who consistently break the most basic site rules Warren DeMontague Apr 2013 #13
Yep.. and I`m seeing a fuckton of "DU sux" lately.. opiate69 Apr 2013 #15
Bashing Skinner seems to be a hobby as well Hayabusa Apr 2013 #14
Wow theKed Apr 2013 #18
Magnum opus. lumberjack_jeff Apr 2013 #20
last time around, the blogger known as "sargasso sea" came back... as "sargasso sea" Warren DeMontague Apr 2013 #21
Part #3: okay, so we're not supposed to notice what the comments, there, say. Warren DeMontague Apr 2013 #16
Didn't you hear? opiate69 Apr 2013 #17
So if the poster who made the reference to the comments wants to clairfy, this would be a good place Warren DeMontague Apr 2013 #19
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Men's Group»...Just don't suggest tha...»Reply #11