Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Men's Group

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)

19. So if the poster who made the reference to the comments wants to clairfy, this would be a good place

Reply to Warren DeMontague (Original post)

Thu Apr 4, 2013, 12:29 PM

Apr 2013

to do so.

Just so we're all very, very clear as to what was said:

This makes me smile.

For the past few days on DU there has been a frantic effort to suppress a discussion of benevolent sexism by making fun of it and changing the subject to doors.

If all those men read the post and comments at your link and could understand even a portion of the conversation they would really be panic-stricken.

Thanks for posting.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

21 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

...Just don't suggest that "Misandry" is actually, you know, a thing. [View all] Warren DeMontague Mar 2013 OP

This is just lunacy. MrSlayer Mar 2013 #1

Oh, absolutely. These people are off in the happy hills with the wee folk. Warren DeMontague Mar 2013 #2

Yes, it's not brilliant satire. n/t lumberjack_jeff Mar 2013 #6

"They shouldn't be confused with actual, mainstream feminists" Bonobo Mar 2013 #4

Would the people in question call themselves feminists? lumberjack_jeff Mar 2013 #5

neofeminism sigmasix Mar 2013 #3

neofeminist? more like anachrofeminist Sen. Walter Sobchak Mar 2013 #7

This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague Mar 2013 #8

Unlocking. I think this is important given the discussion of "MRA views" and the like in GD. Warren DeMontague Apr 2013 #9

Here are some FACTS. I invite everyone concerned to "fact check me"- get it? Warren DeMontague Apr 2013 #10

-continued- .. so why is this relevant? Warren DeMontague Apr 2013 #11

No, no, no.. remember.. opiate69 Apr 2013 #12

my favorite is when the people who consistently break the most basic site rules Warren DeMontague Apr 2013 #13

Yep.. and I`m seeing a fuckton of "DU sux" lately.. opiate69 Apr 2013 #15

Bashing Skinner seems to be a hobby as well Hayabusa Apr 2013 #14

Wow theKed Apr 2013 #18

Magnum opus. lumberjack_jeff Apr 2013 #20

last time around, the blogger known as "sargasso sea" came back... as "sargasso sea" Warren DeMontague Apr 2013 #21

Part #3: okay, so we're not supposed to notice what the comments, there, say. Warren DeMontague Apr 2013 #16

Didn't you hear? opiate69 Apr 2013 #17

So if the poster who made the reference to the comments wants to clairfy, this would be a good place Warren DeMontague Apr 2013 #19